That’s fmr. NFL great Terry Bradshaw parroting propaganda conceived during the Cold War and later popularized to the masses in the 1970’s:
The President of the United came out attacking NFL players for them exercising the freedom of speech. People died for that freedom!
Prior to 1948, when President Harry Truman first institutionalized peacetime propaganda through the State Dept.– most Americans would have scoffed at the notion that soldiers enlisted in the military to defend any of the following:
- Freedom of non-mainstream religions.
- Freedom to protest the National Anthem.
- Freedom to express controversial political opinions at the workplace.
To the extent these freedoms were preserved through war, it was purely incidental.
The 20-40% that agitated for rebellion were decidedly anti-free speech. Mobs of “patriots” terrorized those who spoke favorably of the British– eventually forcing some 80,000 “loyalists” to flee overseas under threat of being tarred and feathered:
As for Washington’s Continental Army, the majority of enlistees just needed the money:
And when these high-minded idealists weren’t paid as promised, they plotted insurrection:
The North and South were both anti-free speech. Abraham Lincoln
Civil War soldiers weren’t fighting for speech. In fact, many of them fought against their will:
World War 1 & 2
There is no evidence to suggest that a single soldier– not 1– that fought in World War I or II did so to defend unpopular speech.
The US at the time wasn’t particularly big on civil rights. Dissent was often seen as sedition. In WWII, being Japanese, or even German, was grounds for internment.
The majority of volunteers leading up to and during WWI & WWII were seeking (1) career opportunities, (2) adventure, and/or (3) a chance to kill foreigners…
The rest (a majority) were drafted into compulsory service.
Korea & Vietnam
There is no evidence to suggest that 1 single soldier in Korea or Vietnam fought to defend free speech.
The majority of volunteers leading up to and during Korea and Vietnam were seeking (1) career opportunities and/or (2) adventure…
The rest (~25%) were drafted into compulsory service.
Afghanistan & Iraq
There is no evidence to suggest that 1 single soldier in Iraq or Afghanistan enlisted to defend the right to protest during the National Anthem.
The majority of volunteers leading up to and during Afghanistan and Iraq were seeking (1) career opportunities, (2) adventure, and/or (3) revenge for 9/11.
Case in point, via Army Times:
In the history of the US armed forces, a recruiter has never ever convinced anyone to join the military by promising a life of hardship so that minorities could protest during the National Anthem.
Until recently, literally no one enlisted in the military to defend speech they disagreed with. The myth that they was initially concocted as psychological warfare against the Soviets, and later adopted by various interest groups to advance their agendas:
- Beginning in the 70’s, it was adopted by the Left to justify radical liberal provocations deleterious to social cohesion.
- After 9/11, libertarians adopted it as a defense against war-mongering neocons.
- After Obama got erected, it was weaponized by largely Jewish “conservative” authors and talk show hosts to justify inciting violence on college campuses in order to sell ghostwritten books.
For better or worse, this propaganda’s authors never lived to see the decades of arguing between retards that their deceit wrought.